Our Blog

What is Legal Custody in California?

When parents live apart, the issues surrounding custody of their children often become very stressful and contentious. It is only natural to want to maintain the connection with your children and to be as much a part of their lives as possible.

With regard to custody in California, parents need to consider both physical and legal custody. Physical custody is what most people think of when they hear the word “custody.” It involves the child’s living arrangements and visitation schedule, often referred to as parenting time.

Legal custody is quite different, but just as important. In this post, we’ll explore what it means to have legal custody in California and how parents can protect their right to legal custody.

Legal Custody Gives You Authority Over Important Decisions in Your Child’s Life

Parents make numerous decisions that affect the course of their children’s lives, often without even realizing it. They decide where their child will go to school, at what age they should receive particular vaccinations, whether their child will attend church, and a host of other issues. Having the right, ability, and authority to make these types of decisions is what constitutes legal custody.

Examples of issues that are included with legal custody include deciding:

  • Where a child should attend daycare
  • Which doctor will be a child’s primary physician
  • Whether a child can participate in contact sports such as football
  • Which school program a child should be enrolled in
  • Whether a child will be allowed to go on a school field trip out of state
  • Which dentist will care for the child’s teeth and what age they should have their first check-up
  • Whether a child needs therapy or counseling, and who they should see
  • How to respond to a disciplinary problem at school
  • Whether a child will attend Sunday School or vacation Bible school
  • What types of medication a child is allowed to receive

Legal custody can involve so many issues that it can be difficult to reconcile for parents who do not cooperate well.

California Often Grants Joint Legal Custody to Parents

Even when physical custody is granted solely to one parent, California courts often share legal custody between parents. In theory, this gives parents an equal say in the important decisions affecting their child’s upbringing. It allows both parents to play a key role in a child’s life. It also should prevent one parent from making a sudden change that the other does not approve of, such as removing the child from the school they’ve attended for years to switch to an experimental alternative program.

Joint legal custody should give parents an equal role in determining their child’s future. As a practical matter, if one parent is determined to have their way, that can either lead to painful conflict or a situation where the other parent is shut out of decision-making.

In a shared legal custody arrangement, your attorney can take steps to protect your parental rights. For instance, you might establish an agreement that gives one parent authority over particular decisions and the other parent authority over other decisions. Or an agreement might specify that certain major decisions must be mutually agreed on while other decisions can be made by the parent who has physical custody of the child at the time. As an example of how that might work, parents would have to agree regarding which school the child attends, but the parent who has the child at the time could make the decision about whether a child could attend a field trip.

When Legal Custody is Granted to One Parent Only

In some situations, courts will grant one parent sole legal custody, as well as sole physical custody. The other parent may have visitation rights, although the visitation may be supervised.

Often when a parent is granted sole legal custody, it is because the court believes the other parent has done something wrong or that the other parent is incapable of making decisions that are in a child’s best interests. If one parent is abusive or mentally unstable and evidence of this is presented to the court, then the other parent is likely to be given sole legal custody. If you are in a situation where you are attempting to co-parent with someone who you believe poses a danger to the child’s wellbeing, or if you are a parent who has been falsely accused of abuse or other misconduct, it is important to work with an attorney who can protect your parental rights and your child’s best interests.

Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC Helps Achieve Your Goals for Legal Custody

The Certified Family Law Specialists and associates at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC understand how to help you gain legal custody and how to establish arrangements that enable you to exercise decision-making authority effectively in all types of situations. For help with legal custody or any other family law matter, call 855-426-9111 or contact our team online today to schedule a confidential consultation.

Custody Schedules in California—Setting the Right Schedule

Parents in California are often so worried about “getting” custody that they don’t focus enough on the details regarding parenting time. The details of a custody schedule will play a huge role in the lives of the parents and children going forward, so it is crucial to give careful consideration to the process of developing that schedule. Working with an attorney who is experienced in this process and who is willing to take the time to help you iron out the details can make a tremendous difference in your future as a parent.

With over 300 years of collective experience helping parents obtain the right parenting schedules, the team at Holstrom, Block & Parke has seen a wide range of custody schedules built to fit the specific needs of families in different circumstances. Here we explain some of the basics about establishing a custody schedule and give some examples of custody schedules that you can consider as you work to develop your own plan.

Parenting Plans in California

Generally, parenting plans in California address both legal and physical custody. Legal custody refers to the ability to make decisions about a child’s upbringing, so a custody schedule involves physical custody—where the child lives. Parents can share both types of custody or one parent may be granted sole custody. When one parent has sole physical custody, the court will establish an order regarding visitation for the other parent. This could be:

  • Scheduled visitation: The court order establishes dates and times that the child will be with each parent. Scheduled visitation can address holidays, vacations, and special occasions such as birthdays.
  • Open-ended visitation: The court order does not specify a schedule for visitation but allows parents to work this out on their own.
  • Supervised visitation: When the court has concerns about a child’s safety while with the noncustodial parent, the court order might specify the terms for supervising visits with that parent.
  • No visitation: If the court finds that even supervised visitation would put the child at an undue risk of physical or emotional harm, then the order will not allow any parenting time to the noncustodial parent.

So, a custody schedule is needed both in situations where parents share physical custody and in situations where one parent has sole physical custody and the other has parenting time.

Joint Custody Schedules

Some of the most common schedules for parents sharing physical custody are the “alternating weeks” schedule and the “3-4-4-3” schedule. As the names imply, the alternating weeks schedule has a child spending 7 days in one parent’s home and then switching to the other parent’s home for the next 7 days, while the 3-4-4-3 schedule puts a child with one parent for 3 days one week and 4 days the next.

Of course, parents are free to develop their own schedules, and just because parents have joint physical custody does not mean that they each need to have the child exactly 50% of the time. If one parent works a traditional weekday schedule while the other works 12 hour shifts on weekends, for instance, it might work best for the child to be with one parent from Friday afternoon to Monday morning while the other parent takes the child during the remainder of the week. In a joint custody arrangement, the child is with each parent at least 30% of the time, but parents can get creative about how they want to arrange the time. If the schedule provides a safe and secure atmosphere for the child, the court is likely to approve it.

Sole Custody Schedules

Even when the court order does not set a schedule for visitation, it is good for parents to establish a schedule on their own so that both parents and children can feel confident that they will enjoy parenting time on a regular basis. One traditional visitation that still works well for many families is for the child to be with the noncustodial parent one day during the week and every other weekend. While this works well for parents with traditional work schedules and children who are in school or daycare, it is not always the most advantageous in other situations.

For a young child and parents with unpredictable work schedules, it might work to have a standing arrangement that puts the child with the noncustodial parent on that parent’s first day off each week, whenever that happens to fall. It is important to consider childcare arrangements, parents’ work schedules, the child’s schedule, and a host of other factors when setting a parenting plan.

Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC Can Help You Arrangement a Beneficial Custody Schedule

While it is particularly important to establish a workable and advantageous custody schedule when that schedule will become part of the court order, it is helpful to have a schedule that sets expectations in every situation, even when the court allows parents to be flexible. The experienced team at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC can work with you to consider all the details that will affect your parenting plan and help you develop the right schedule for your needs and the needs of your child. Contact us today to learn more about the ways we can assist with custody and other family law matters.

How a Mother Can Lose a Custody Battle

Custody in California is not the one-sided contest that it used to be. Not so long ago, mothers were presumed to be the best caregivers and custodians, and fathers who wanted custody faced an uphill battle that could prove nearly impossible to win.

Those days are gone. Mothers can and do lose custody battles all the time. When parents do not agree explicitly on custody arrangements for their children–if there are any issues of a parenting plan under dispute–it is vital for both parents to work with an attorney who is prepared to present the best legal arguments to support their goals. Emotional pleas used to carry some weight in custody proceedings, but in the courtroom today, excessive emotion may work against you rather than in your favor.

As experienced custody attorneys, our team has seen numerous situations where poor strategy, foolish behavior, and even simple mistakes have caused a mother to lose in a custody battle. Here are some of the most common mistakes and how you can avoid them.

Making False Accusations

In their attempts to gain or hang onto custody, mothers sometimes resort to falsely accusing the other parent of child abuse, neglect, sexual abuse, or parental alienation. When the other parent’s attorney is able to show that the allegations are false and the mother knew she was making unfounded accusations, this makes her look vicious and unreliable.

While it can be difficult to prove that a parent who is engaged in a custody battle knowingly made false accusations, when an attorney is able to present the evidence persuasively, it can make a tremendous impression on the court. Judges do not like to have someone attempt to trick them, so false accusations can backfire and cause a mother to lose custody.

Child Abuse

Physical, sexual, or emotional abuse from a mother can put her on the losing side of a custody battle. Sometimes parents will allege that their child needs discipline, but the “corrective” actions they take go far beyond what is warranted or safe. Abuse often stems from an inability to control angry impulses. A child who is close at hand—and who is not likely to fight back—can be a convenient scapegoat when a parent is feeling frustrated and out of control. Often, mothers who hit or otherwise abuse their children suffered from the same type of abuse in their own childhoods, and the process seems almost natural.

Violation of Court Orders

Just as judges do not like to be lied to, they also do not like their orders to be ignored. When a court issues an order about anything, from a temporary custody plan to child support to a restraining order, if a mother fails to follow the terms of the order and does not offer a very good excuse for doing so, she can lose a custody battle. Violating a court order shows that someone lacks proper respect for the law and cannot be trusted to follow legal requirements.

Parental Alienation

Mothers often engage in some form of parental alienation tactics—sometimes without even realizing it. Parental alienation involves efforts to damage or destroy a child’s relationship with the other parent. Sometimes, this occurs through actions and language that very subtly send a message that the child is not safe with the other parent or that the other parent does not love them.

Other times, parental alienation involves more obvious actions, such as constantly blaming the other parent for problems, refusing to give the other parent information about the child’s schedule, preventing the child from speaking with the other parent, and removing all evidence of the other parent, including gifts from that parent. Courts take allegations of parental alienation very seriously, so when they are presented with persuasive evidence that a mother is engaging in parental alienation, she can lose custody.

Demonstrating Lack of Fitness in Other Ways

Courts usually want a child to have access to both parents, so they must see serious evidence that a parent is unfit before they will deny custody. Unfortunately, some mothers provide that evidence by making some poor choices. Refusing to seek serious help for a substance abuse problem is probably one of the most common ways a mother can demonstrate that she is not fit to take care of her child. Living with a partner who has a history of domestic violence or child abuse is another was to demonstrate that a mother is not prepared to parent safely.

Mental health issues can cause a mother to lose custody if she does not seek treatment that is sufficient to control the condition. Neglecting a child by leaving the child unattended or placing the child in someone else’s care for extended periods can also provide grounds for losing custody.

Holstrom, Block & Parke Can Help You Succeed in a Custody Battle

Parents who want to obtain and keep custody of their children need to seek advice from an experienced attorney and then follow that advice to the letter. Failure to do so could cause them to give the impression that they are not fit to parent the child, and the other parent could be given full custody for the child’s safety.

At Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC, our team has over 300 collective years of experience helping parents gain the custody arrangements that best meet the needs of their children. For a free, confidential consultation to learn more about how we can help you win a custody battle, contact us today.

How To Get Full Custody Of A Child As A Father in California

The subject of child custody is often a pivotal and deeply emotional point of contention in family law cases. As a father in California, you may wonder if current laws and policies place you at a disadvantage if you want to secure full custody of your child. At Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC, we understand the nuances of this process and the steps that can be most effective in reaching your custody goals.

Understanding Custody Basics in California

Custody matters in California are divided into two main categories: legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody refers to the authority to make significant decisions regarding the child's welfare, education, and health, while physical custody pertains to where the child resides. As fathers aim for full custody, it's crucial to grasp that the court's paramount concern is the child's best interests, not the gender of the parent.

Building a Strong Case for Full Custody

To sway the court in favor of granting full custody, fathers must present a compelling case that showcases their ability to serve as the primary and most suitable caregiver for their child. This involves demonstrating that you can provide a stable environment, emotional support, involvement in the child’s daily life, and the ability to meet the child's needs. Documenting your involvement in school activities, medical appointments, and extracurricular events can significantly bolster your position.

Highlighting the Child's Best Interests

The cornerstone of any custody decision in California is the child's best interests. Fathers seeking full custody should focus on how such an arrangement benefits the child, prioritizing the child’s overall well-being above all else. When presenting your case, it's essential to demonstrate how full custody by the father will positively impact the child's life. Consider the following aspects:

  • Providing a More Stable Home Environment: Stability is key in a child's life. Illustrate your ability to provide a consistent routine, a safe living situation, and emotional stability. This can include showing how your home is conducive to the child's needs, your work schedule allows for ample parenting time, and that you have made a commitment to maintaining a structured environment.
  • Better Educational Opportunities: If living with you offers access to superior schools or educational resources, highlight this fact. Discuss the quality of the local school district, the availability of special education programs if needed, or how the child's current academic needs are being met under your care.
  • Stronger Emotional Support System: A nurturing environment is critical for a child's development. Emphasize your role in providing emotional support, understanding, and guidance. This includes your involvement in their extracurricular activities, your understanding of their emotional needs, and how you communicate effectively with them.
  • Health and Safety Considerations: Demonstrate your commitment to the child's physical well-being. This can involve showing that your home is in a safe neighborhood, detailing how you plan to address any medical needs the child has, and ensuring that their daily nutritional and physical activity needs are met.
  • Supporting the Child-Parent Relationship with the Other Parent: It's vital to show the court that you encourage a healthy relationship between your child and their other parent. Explain how you plan to facilitate regular communication and visits, your willingness to cooperate on parenting matters, and any steps you've taken to promote a positive relationship between them.

When discussing the child's best interests, it's beneficial to include:

  • Personal Testimonies: Share specific examples and stories that illustrate your close relationship with your child, your understanding of their needs, and how you've previously navigated challenges for their benefit.
  • Professional Evaluations: If applicable, include insights from teachers, child psychologists, or family counselors who can attest to your child's needs and how they're best met in your care.
  • A Forward-Looking Plan: Present a clear, detailed plan for your child's future under your custody, covering education, healthcare, extracurricular activities, and emotional support.

Navigating Challenges and Misconceptions

Many fathers are under the misconception that courts automatically favor mothers in custody battles. However, California law is clear in its gender-neutral stance on custody decisions. The key for fathers is to actively challenge common misconceptions by proving their indispensable role in their child's life. Showing a willingness to facilitate a positive relationship between the child and their other parent can also play a critical role in the court’s decision.

The Right Legal Guidance for Fathers Seeking Full Custody

Securing full custody is a complex legal process because you may need to overcome a presumption the child’s best interests would be served by shared custody. A knowledgeable family law attorney can help you understand your rights and demonstrate why you should receive full custody

If you aim to secure your child's best possible future, our team at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC is ready to support you every step of the way. Reach out to us at 855-426-9111 or online to schedule a consultation. Together, we can work towards achieving the outcome that best serves your and your child's interests.

How a Mother Can Get Full Custody of a Child in California

The law used to presume that mothers were the best natural custodians and caregivers of their children, and many times a mother could gain full custody of a child without expending any particular effort. That presumption is long gone from the laws and the court system, and parents who believe otherwise are often in for a surprise when they discuss custody with their attorney.

Mothers can still gain full custody of their children, but they have to work much harder to prove that this arrangement is in the children’s best interests. It is a good idea to work with a knowledgeable attorney and follow that attorney’s advice about what to do—and what to avoid—to gain full custody.

Joint Custody is Usually a Court’s First Choice

In most cases, there is now a presumption that a child benefits by having both parents involved in the child’s life. That belief is so strong that courts generally prefer to award custody jointly to both parents. This includes both legal custody, which involves the right to make decisions about a child’s education, health care, religious upbringing and other issues, as well as physical custody, which involves the child’s living arrangements. While it may not be possible for a child to spend an exactly equal amount of time with each parent, courts usually want to try to create an arrangement allowing both parents to share custody in some way.

To overcome this preference, a mother seeking full custody must be prepared to submit substantial evidence to show why a child would suffer harm rather than benefit by being in the custody of the father. It may be easier to obtain full physical custody than full legal custody. A mother seeking full custody should consider carefully the different responsibilities of each type of custody and consider whether she would accept an arrangement that provides full physical custody and shared legal custody. Even if a mother gains full physical and legal custody, the other parent may still have visitation rights.

Showing That the Other Parent is Not Fit

For one parent to obtain sole legal and physical custody, they must convince the court that the other parent is not able to provide the appropriate care for the child. Courts are generally more likely to award sole custody to a mother when there is evidence that the other parent:

  • Has committed domestic violence or has a history of child abuse or neglect
  • Is legally unfit to parent a child
  • Has falsely accused the mother of child abuse or neglect
  • Cannot provide a home that protects the child’s physical or emotional safety

Proving accusations of this type can be difficult and painful, so it is important to be prepared and to take steps to protect the child from exposure to excessive arguments and animosity. If a mother can demonstrate that the other parent has substance abuse issues, that can make it easier to persuade the court that the other parent is not fit to have custody, but that is no guarantee. An experienced attorney can help prepare effective arguments to show a court why denying custody to the other parent serves the child’s best interests.

When a Child Only Has One Legal and Biological Parent

In situations where a mother is not married at the time her child is born and no one has taken steps to establish legal paternity, then the mother automatically has full custody.  If the mother lived with a partner who acted as parent to the child but who did not adopt the child and who does not have a biological relationship with the child, that partner has no right to custody or even visitation.

However, if the partner was a registered domestic partner when the child was conceived or born, or if the birth mother filed a declaration establishing legal parentage, then the partner has some parental rights. Parentage can also be established by court order. While legal parentage does not automatically give a parent the right to custody or visitation, it does establish child support obligations.

Work with an Attorney Prepared to Advocate for Your Custody Goals

Custody is a complex issue full of nuances that can sway a court in one direction or another. The dedicated team at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC has over 300 years of combined experience advocating on behalf of parents to help them prove why their preferred custody arrangements serve the best interests of their children.

For a confidential consultation to learn more about how to gain sole custody or fight another parent’s attempt to deny you custody, we invite you to schedule a consultation with our Certified Family Law Specialists and associates today.

What Can Be Used Against You in a Custody Battle in California?

Custody battles often form the most contentious and painful part of a divorce. Advice and advocacy from an experienced attorney can help you achieve your goals for custody, but you need to take certain steps to protect yourself and preserve your best opportunities.

Specifically, you need to avoid certain conduct that could make you look bad to the judge and work against your interests. As experienced divorce attorneys, here are some of the most common and problematic mistakes we’ve seen parents make that hurt their chances in a custody battle.

Violating Court Orders

Of all the things someone can do to damage their reputation with a judge, refusing to follow court orders would need to be near the top of the list. No one wants their authority undermined and their instructions ignored, so violating a court order could be personally irritating to the judge. It demonstrates a lack of respect for the law that can harm a child in numerous ways. So it is important to follow orders regarding payment of child support and alimony, temporary custody arrangements, restraining orders, or anything else.

Physical and Verbal Abuse

It probably goes without saying that if you hit or otherwise physically abuse someone in your family, evidence of that conduct will be used against you in your effort to seek custody. What many parents fail to realize, however, is that evidence of verbal abuse can be just as harmful. This includes ranting on social media. Excessive displays of temper can damage a child’s psyche, and judges are aware of this. While it may be very difficult to keep your temper under control, try to vent frustrations away from your children and the other parent, and away from other witnesses if possible.

Failing to Cooperate with the Other Parent

The law presumes it is in a child’s best interests to have meaningful contact with both parents, and that requires cooperation. If you refuse to communicate with the other parent, show up late when it’s time to drop off the child, and deny the other parent reasonable opportunities to communicate with the child, you are demonstrating to the court that you are not willing to cooperate in the task of parenting. While you might feel that you shouldn’t have to cooperate and that the child should be in your sole custody, the court may be likely to feel that the child would be better off in the sole custody of the other parent.

Moving in with a New Partner

It is hard for a child to accept that their parents are no longer together, and it can take considerable time for a child to adjust to this new reality. When a parent starts living with a new partner, that can make the situation much more difficult for the child to grasp. In addition, there can be concerns about whether the new partner poses a risk to the child’s health or safety. Courts are often reluctant to expose a child to an unsettling, risky situation, so it is better to keep any new relationships quiet until the divorce is finalized.

Parental Alienation Tactics

Sometimes intentionally and sometimes without realizing it, one parent will engage in behavior that turns a child against the other parent. This could involve making disparaging remarks about the other parent, refusing to share information about school or other activities so that the other parent is not able to participate in the child’s life, denying contact, taking away gifts from the other parent, and saying things to hint that that other parent is putting the child in danger. If you do or say anything that could be viewed as an attempt to alienate a child’s affections or damage their relationship with the other parent, that can be considered engaging in parental alienation, and used against you

Other Issues That Can Be Used Against You

A skilled attorney can argue that many situations and actions create a situation that is not in a child’s best interests. Additional issues that could be used against you in a custody battle include:

  • Substance abuse
  • Removing a child from school or daycare without good reason
  • Placing the child with a caregiver for an extended period
  • Mental health issues that are not controlled adequately with medication
  • Criminal conduct

If the other parent raises a difficult issue, your attorney should be prepared to provide an explanation showing why the factor should not be used against you. In order to do that, your attorney must have accurate information, so it is important to be honest and thorough when reviewing issues with your attorney.

An Experienced Attorney Can Help You Take the Right Steps to Gain Custody

Getting—and following—good legal advice is often the key to gaining your objectives for custody and other matters in your divorce. The team at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC is ready to apply over 300+ years of collective experience to help you gain the best advantages for your future, including your preferred custody arrangements. Call us at 855-426-9111 or contact us online to schedule a free, confidential consultation with our team to learn more about how we can help.

Do You Have the Right to See Your Grandchildren?

The state of California provides grandparents with certain rights, but what do those rights include? Do you have the right to see your grandchildren if their parent or guardian doesn’t want you to? How do you enforce your rights?

An experienced family law attorney can help you define and enforce your rights in various situations. The facts of each case often determine what rights are available, but here are some general guidelines.

Grandparents’ Rights are More Limited Than They Used to Be

Courts in California frequently used to award grandparents the ability to visit with their grandchildren even if the children’s parents objected and did not want the grandparents to be a part of the children’s lives. However, a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court required states to give more power to parents, ruling that parents have the final say when it comes to their children’s upbringing.

As a result, many states, including California, enacted new statutes imposing limits on the grandparents’ visitation rights. In some cases, grandparents also have the right to seek custody of their grandchildren, but those rights are also severely restricted.

Two-Step Process to Gain Visitation Rights

In order to be able to exercise the right to visit with your grandchild over the objection of the child’s parents, you need to satisfy two requirements. First, you must show that a situation exists that gives you the legal right to request visitation. Once you’ve satisfied the first element, then you must demonstrate that it is in the child’s best interests to grant you visitation rights. Because parents have so much control over their children’s lives, courts can only override their choices in very specific situations.

When a Grandparent is Allowed to Seek Visitation in California

To have the opportunity to demonstrate that grandparents should receive visitation rights, one of the following situations must exist:

  • The child’s parent (through whom the grandparents are related) has passed away
  • The child’s parents are divorced or living apart on an indefinite basis
  • One of the child’s parents has been gone for more than a month
  • One parent supports the grandparents’ request for visitation rights
  • A stepparent has adopted the child
  • One of the child’s parents is confined in prison or an institution
  • The child does not live with either parent

If a grandparent gains visitation but the condition that qualified them to apply for visitation ceases to exist, the parent who objects to visitation can ask the court to terminate the grandparent’s rights. If a child’s parent is deceased and the child has been adopted by someone other than a stepparent or grandparent, then the grandparent is not in a position to seek visitation.

Proving That it is in the Child’s Best Interests to Grant Visitation

The law presumes that it is not in the child’s best interests to award visitation to a grandparent when one of the child’s parents objects to that visitation. Therefore, grandparents need to work hard to overcome this presumption and show why visitation serves the best interests of their grandchild. It is important to focus on how the child will suffer if the relationship is lost, rather than focusing on any detriment to the grandparent. The court will make decisions on the basis of the child’s interests only, so it does no good to point out how the loss of the relationship affects the grandparents.

Specifically, the court will need to see evidence of a preexisting relationship between the child and grandparent, and that relationship must have created such a bond between them that removing that relationship would be detrimental to the child. Once a grandparent has established that such a bond exists, the court weighs the child’s interests in having continued contact against the objecting parent’s right to exercise parental authority.

Negotiating a Solution

In many cases, when a parent objects to visitation by a grandparent, filing a lawsuit only makes the relationships worse, and it can be harmful to the child in the long run. Often it works better to have an attorney or mediator help family members to reach their own agreement on the subject. Moderated discussions between family members often help everyone understand the underlying nature of the conflict so that they can resolve issues or reach a compromise that allows for continued positive relationships in the future.

Talk to Holstrom, Block & Parke APLC About How We Could Help You Gain the Right to See Your Grandchildren

A child’s life is enriched through contact with family members, including grandparents. At Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC, our team of Certified Family Law Specialists understand the most effective methods to help grandparents remain a part of their grandchildren’s lives. We invite you to call us at 855-426-9111 or schedule a consultation online to learn more about the ways we can assist in gaining visitation rights.

Right of First Refusal in Custody Orders

A right of first refusal is common in contracts, but not as well known when it comes to child custody in California. When a right of first refusal is included in a custody order, it creates obligations when a parent is unable to care for a child and would typically contact a babysitter.

Instead of asking a neighbor, relative, or sitter to care for the child, the parent needing assistance is required to contact the other parent and give them the opportunity to watch the child before they ask anyone else. Some people refer to this provision as a “first right to care for a child” instead of first right of refusal.

A right of first refusal can be helpful in some custody situations and problematic in others. It is a good idea to discuss the potential need for a right of first refusal with your custody attorney. Here are some factors to keep in mind.

First Right of Refusal Can Be Structured in Different Ways

Parents can establish a structure that gives parents a first right of refusal in a great number of instances or only in specific situations. For instance, they might establish an order that requires the custodial parent to give the other parent to watch the child if the custodial parent will be away from the child for a certain number of hours or overnight. Or the order might specify that before the parent can enroll the child in daycare, that parent must give the other parent the first opportunity to provide care for the child.

Parents can agree to include right of first refusal provisions in their custody stipulation that then becomes part of the court order. Or if one parent wants a right of first refusal and the other does not, then the parent seeking the order will need to convince a judge that the right of first refusal would serve the child’s interests.

Of course, parents who cooperate together can establish their own understanding where they agree to call each other first in certain situations. This type of arrangement does not have the force of a court order, but it often results in less stress and friction for the child.

When a Right of First Refusal May Be a Good Idea

There are instances when a parent requests parenting time that they are simply not prepared to provide. For instance, a parent might request a 50/50 custody schedule to keep child support obligations low or just to prevent the other parent from having a greater share of time with the child. If that parent has a work schedule that prevents them from actually being with the child 50% of the time, the child may be placed with a babysitter for considerable periods. In that type of situation, a right of first refusal can allow the child to spend more time with a parent instead of being passed off to babysitters.

Generally, a right of first refusal is most helpful when it is only triggered by an overnight stay. For instance, parents might agree to give each other the first right to provide care if the child needs overnight care for more than two nights. Or the agreement might specify that if the custodial parent must be away for one night or more and the grandparents are unable to care for the child, then the custodial parent must give the other parent the right to provide care.

Problems with a Right of First Refusal in Custody Situations

When parents insist on strict adherence to the right of first refusal rules, the situation can become complicated and stressful. For example, if a parent’s car breaks down when they are supposed to pick up the child from school, instead of asking a neighbor or friend to pick up the child, they may be required to attempt to contact the other parent instead, and by the time they reach the other parent, there may be no one else available to assist the child if the other parent is not able to leave work and get the child.

Or if a parent exercises their right of first refusal to take the child for a night, then the other parent might demand that the parent give up a future night to keep parenting time even.

An Experienced Attorney Can Help You Establish the Right Custody Arrangements for Your Family

Before making a decision about whether you want to include a first right of refusal in your custody order, it is helpful to discuss the details of your situation with your attorney. At Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC, our Certified Family Law Specialists and associates have extensive experience with first right of refusal clauses in custody arrangements, so we can describe the situations where these clauses have proven helpful and situations where they cause more problems than they solve.

We invite you to schedule a free consultation to learn more about the ways we can help with divorce, custody, and other family law matters. Just call 855-426-9111 or contact us online to get started.

How is child custody determined in California?

Making decisions about child custody is a crucial aspect of divorce proceedings in California, and of course it is also critical for parents who never married. At the heart of it, the law focuses on what is in the best interests of the child. 

If parents can't agree on a custody plan, the California courts will step in. When making these determinations, they consider various factors to ensure the child's well-being. These factors are important to keep in mind whether you are devising your own plan or allowing the judge to make the decisions.

 

Types of Child Custody in California

In California, child custody arrangements can vary widely based on the circumstances of the parents. The state categorizes child custody into two primary types, physical and legal. These types of custody can be shared or issued solely to one parent.

1.Physical Custody: This type of custody addresses the child's living arrangements. When a parent has physical custody, it means the child resides with them for a specific duration, whether it's for a few days a week, alternate weeks, or even longer intervals.

  • Joint Physical Custody: Under this arrangement, the child lives with both parents, splitting time between their residences. The split doesn't necessarily have to be equal, but both parents have significant periods with the child.
  • Sole Physical Custody: Here, the child primarily lives with one parent. The other parent may or may not have visitation rights. In situations where they do, it's generally outlined in a visitation schedule.

 

2.Legal Custody: This pertains to the rights and responsibilities of making significant decisions about the child's upbringing, such as their education, medical care, religious instruction, and other welfare-related choices.

  • Joint Legal Custody: Both parents share the responsibility of making major life decisions for the child. Even if the child lives with one parent more than the other, both parents have an equal say in these crucial choices.
  • Sole Legal Custody: In this scenario, only one parent has the authority to make major decisions about the child's life. This could be due to various reasons, such as one parent being deemed unfit or the parents being unable to make joint decisions due to high levels of conflict.

Navigating the nuances of child custody in California requires a sound understanding of the state's laws and a clear sense of what's best for the child. 

 

Factors Influencing Custody Decisions in California

In child custody cases in California, the overarching principle is the child's best interests. Legally, this is not a vague or arbitrary concept that it might first appear to be. Over time, the standard has been fleshed out to include a consideration of several critical factors including:

  • The Child's Age and Health: Younger kids may need stable routines. Health needs can influence which parent is better equipped to provide care.
  • Emotional Ties: Courts consider which parent has a deeper emotional bond with the child and who has been more involved in daily life.
  • Parental Capabilities: Beyond love, this encompasses financial stability, a safe environment, and the parent's physical and mental health.
  • History of Violence or Abuse: A record of abuse can heavily influence custody decisions, prioritizing the child's safety above all.
  • The Child's Connection to Their Environment: Uprooting a child from familiar settings like school or community can impact custody outcomes.

It’s vitally important to ensure that your attorney has all the information regarding factors that weigh in your favor. For instance, if you’re the parent who puts the child to bed every night, that detail can be very important. 

 

Considering the Child's Preferences

In California, if a child is mature enough (typically around 12 years or older) and wishes to express a preference in custody, the court might consider their opinion. However, it's only one of many factors, and the child's preference does not guarantee a specific outcome.

 

Modification of Child Custody in California

Living circumstances evolve, and situations may arise post-divorce that necessitate a change in the custody agreement. In California, you can request a modification if there's a significant change in circumstances, like a relocation or a change in the child's needs. It's crucial to approach these modification requests with the guidance of knowledgeable attorneys to ensure the child's best interests remain paramount.

 

Ensuring the Well-being of Your Child with Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC

Child custody decisions are among the most emotionally charged in the divorce process. We understand that you want the best for your child, and our team at Holstrom, Block & Parke, APLC, is here to support you every step of the way. 

If you're navigating this complex area, lean on a knowledgeable team to guide you. Call Holstrom, Block & Parke APLC today at (844) 237-5791 or contact us online to schedule a consultation with a supportive child custody attorney in California.

Understanding and Preparing for a Move-Away Case

A Move Away case is one where a parent seeks to relocate to some other geographic area with a child they share with a parent who will remain local. Recently, there has been a dramatic increase in requests for consultations and representation in move-away cases. Some of the requests are due to the simple desire to leave California and reside in another state. Others have job opportunities in another state, or would like to be closer to family. We’ve also received requests from parents who would like to oppose the move-away request by the other parent. Whatever the case may be, understanding the intricacies and legalities of move-away cases is paramount to prevailing in such a case and often that is concurrently doing what is best for the child.

What is a move-away case?

A move-away is a particular type of custody case where two parents have a dispute or disagreement about what's going to happen with their kid(s) when either parent is going to relocate and there is an existing custodial arrangement. For example, they've got a schedule, maybe the parties have been separated for a couple years, or even a few months, but they have an existing de facto or status quo custodial relationship. The arrangement, or custodial relationship, could be 50/50, it could be 80/20. Or it may not be a percentage of time, but something like a set number of days during the week, and alternating weekends. When the kids are typically younger in age it is optimal, from a psychological developmental perspective, for a shared arrangement to grant more time to the parent who has more capability to be home and care for them (if such a circumstance exists).

Whatever the very legitimate and appropriate reason for the existing arrangements, whether by court order or not, the court will make a decision, or the parties have made a decision, that the existing arrangement is in the best interest of the child. A move-away case is a significant undertaking that happens with some frequency--And that frequency is increasing with today’s societal mobility, economic uncertainty, the ability to find more “virtual” employment opportunities, new relationships being formed from long distance, and ever changing migration patterns.

There is an abundance of law from the state of California, that relates to how the court should handle these cases, so that they're handled consistently the same. Yet the tactics and strategies exist that increase the probability of success, whether seeking to relocate with the child(ren), or opposing such a move.

How does a move-away case differ from a visitation case?

Custody time (also called “time-share”) is a plan for how the parents will share time with the children. This may also be referred to as “custody time” or “visitation” or the like. It is a shorthand way to refer to the amount of time a child is with each respective parent. Such court orders vary, depending on the best interest of the children, the situation of the parents, and other factors. If the case is more about minimal schedule changes, it's not a custody case. It's what we call a time-share type case. These cases are typically easier to resolve because we're not talking about a dramatic change in a custodial arrangement.

What many parents fail to understand…

The foundation for every custodial arrangement is what is in the best interest of the children, which includes relocation. So often, parents talk about “my time,” and they use the word “my kids”. They assert that they are entitled to “their rights”. Those parents are incorrect, and will face tremendous challenges if they are involved in litigation. Custody matters will always be about what's best for the children. The law starts from a presumption that frequent and continuous contact with both parents is what is best for the children. Many people confuse that to be a presumption that this naturally equates to a 50/50 arrangement. This is simply not true. There are so many factors involved in determining what is best for the child, outside of the parents’ opinions. The decision needs to be carefully made by the court in order to avoid having detrimental effect on the children, or impede the other parent's ongoing relationship and access to the child.

Some things courts will consider when determining move-away requests:

  • Which parent (if either) has an actual, or de facto, primary custodial relationship prior to the requested move
  • The good faith reason for the move (ex. job opportunity) -not designed to simply get away form the ex spouse (this is in turn mitigated if there is a history of Domestic Violence)
  • Distance of the move being considered/requested and the logistical issues raised include travel time, cost, etc.
  • The child’s age can be a large factor in the judge’s decision as it may be more difficult for younger children who haven’t had proper time to develop parent/child relationships-or older children who while more physiologically and psychologically developed and bonded have concurrently formed strong bonds with friends, schools, extended family, etc.
  • Any history of violence within the household(s)
  • The current and historical relationship between the parents
  • Ability to maintain proper medical treatment at both locations
  • The parents’ ability to Co-Parent or a lack of willingness to do so
  • The “best interest” of the child
  • The child’s preference and feelings about the move (depending upon the age)
  • An overall assessment of the “detriment” of the move. This issue was given overriding importance in the most recent California Supreme court case on this subject. In such cases, even where a permanent custody order is in place, the custodial parent’s right to relocate with a child remains subject to the changed circumstance rule. (In re Marriage of LaMusga (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1072) 1088-1089 (LaMusga).

It is important to note the individual elements referenced above are not necessarily equal, nor determinative. The court will look at the totality of the circumstances in assessing the best interest and detriment.

Here in Southern California, a classic example of a move-away could be any distance greater than 30 miles, say Orange County to Riverside County. While this doesn’t seem like a huge distance, commute time needs to be taken into consideration. The freeways are often heavy with traffic and while the distance isn’t tremendous, the time it takes to travel between the two areas could frequently be over two hours on any given weekday. The commute is going to impede a parent from being able to spend enough quality time with the children. More importantly, how is that drive going to affect that child? Is it going to affect the ability of a parent to pick up on Friday evening? This kind of move would also potentially mean a change in school districts and various other factors.

Here’s where it gets complicated…

Once the relocation is defined as a move-away, things can get really, really complicated. Sometimes the status quo may not contain a court order that grants parents the ability to relocate. Some attorneys who craft judgments (and some people without attorneys) don't put all of the necessary language outlined in their judgments into their court orders, relative to custody. As is such, it may be possible that a parent could move and then change visitation later on. It's also possible that doing so could have negative consequences. This is one reason why it is critical that you have a discussion with a competent family law attorney to talk about your options, in your case.

What if there isn’t a court order in place for custody?

The following is a hypothetical situation: Two parents are unmarried and they're already living apart. There is no court order in place for custody of their child. One parent decides that they want to relocate with their child. They decide that they're going to go ahead and move to New York without consulting an attorney.

Guess what is likely to happen in this instance.... The other parent (more likely than not) is going to run into court and ask for an emergency order to have that parent, either not relocate with the child or immediately return the child. The parent who has already moved to New York, has probably settled in, secured employment and has started their new life. However, the court can effectively change the custodial arrangement because the first parent acted improperly and failed to do things the right way.

It's imperative to get a plan in place and follow the plan. The commonly used colloquialism that sometimes “It’s better to ask for forgiveness rather than permission” may work--or may lead to disastrous consequences.

How does a parent looking to move away get permission if they need it?

First, they will need to create a paper trail and reach out to the other party stating intent to move. Ask them what their thoughts are on the matter. It may be received well, it may not. Regardless, communicating the intent, (or possible intent,) in writing is always the first step. If they don't ask and just rush to court, then the court is going to think badly of that person for not asking or trying to work it out with the other parent. This is true whether the parents have court orders or not. Someone who is still in an intact relationship and simply takes off in the middle of the night with the child to a far away place is equally subject to an adverse consequence. While a history of Domestic Violence may mitigate this, it may not eliminate it.

A key point to keep in mind is that the court has no authority to tell a parent that they cannot move. Every adult in the United States has an absolute, unrestricted right to travel. The government cannot say that a parent can't move; that they have to stay here and take care of the children. In fact, what the court does when they engage in a move-away, is start with the presumption that the move is happening. They make orders based upon that expectation. The order will either be that the children move with the parent who is relocating, or that they stay with the non-moving parent. Then arrangements for visitation will be made accordingly.

Move-away cases are not a quick and easy process

Whether or not there is a custody order in place, a plan is needed. After step one, it might be time to file the move-away request with the court. If it is a full on move-away case, it's probably going to take quite some time to get the hearing on it and get it done. That means going to court, certainly doing mediation at court, possibly doing a custodial evaluation, setting the matter for an evidentiary hearing with witnesses and cross examination, dealing with cancellations and postponements that are rabid in the court system, particularly with COVID, and finally, having the hearing and getting a court ruling. And even if the parties get a court ruling, thee law of California mandates that the parent is not allowed to move for 30 days after that ruling. This can really drag out and parents really need to plan for the long haul.

How long does it take to resolve a move-away case?

This depends on the courthouse. If the case is being processed within the public court system, then parents at the mercy of the court. There may be shutdowns because of COVID. It may also take awhile if a psychological evaluation, referred to as a “730 Evaluation,"  is required. There may be a trial set for three days on a move-away case, and then some other case bumps it, and it gets postponed for another two or three months. A short time period might be six to nine months, while a long time period might be a year and a half or more, because of how the legal system works. This is why it is important to get started with the process as soon the parent thinks that they will be moving. Parents should always make a plan and seek legal counsel before they accept a job out of state, buy plane tickets, or hire movers. Then again, bad advice can set you back both in time and in the ultimate likelihood of success.

No two move-away cases are alike...

Please remember, every move-away case, like every custody case, is different. There are unique aspects of each and every one. The one thing that always remains the same is that ultimately, this is about what's best for the children. If the parents have a good co parenting arrangement, that can serve as a basic foundation for resolving things amicably. However, parents should only do so after consulting with competent counsel.

If you are contemplating a move and want to do things the right way, please reach out to us as soon as possible. Our team has extensive experience with move-away cases and we can help you plan for this impactful life change in a way that keeps your children the priority and offers the best possible outcome for your family.

PLEASE NOTE:

The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. It does not create an attorney/client relationship in any way, shape or form. Holstrom, Block and Parke are attorneys at law, licensed to practice in the state of California and have based the information presented on US laws. All cases are different and nothing in this content is intended to suggest any particular result for your matter. Holstrom, Block and Parke has no control over and accepts no liability in respect of materials, products or services available on any website which is not under the control of Holstrom, Block and Parke. Certain links in this website will lead to websites which are not under the control of Holstrom, Block and Parke, APLC. When you activate these website links, you will leave the Holstrom, Block and Parke website. Therefore, we have no control over and accept no liability in respect of the materials, products or services available on the third party websites, which are not under control of Holstrom, Block and Parke. There is no substitute for seeking out advice from a competent Family Law professional and you should always consult with an attorney before you rely on this information.

Name(Required)

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.